Kant or not Kant? Arguing on Kant’s Ultimate Political Design for Global Governance and Cosmopolitanism. An Exchange between Claudio Corradetti and Allen Wood
Resumen
In the following reflection Claudio Corradetti and Allen Wood engage in a controversy concerning the possibilities and the limits of textual interpretation. Should an interpreter still be authorized to call an author’s interpretation the logical stretch of text beyond its black printed letters? The authors offer two different standpoints on what can still be defined as textual interpretation. Whereas for Allen Wood a clear-cut separation must be kept between what a text shows and what an interpreter argues starting from the text, for Claudio Corradetti such distinction remains internal to textual exegesis in so far as the interpreter’s conclusions follow a logical pattern of justification starting from evidential hints.
Palabras clave
Referencias
Fichte, G. (2001, [1795, second 1796]), “Review of Immanuel Kant, Perpetual Peace: a Philosophical Sketch”, Königsberg: Nicolovius, trans. by D. Breazeale, The Philosophical Forum, Vol. XXXII, n.4, pp.311-321.
Kant, I. (1979 [1798]), The Conflict of the Faculties. Der Streit der Fakultäten, M. Gregor (trans. and introd.), Abaris Books, New York.
Kant, I. (1998 [1793]), Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. And Other Writings, A. Wood and G. Di Giovanni (eds.), R. Merrihew Adams (intro.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kant, I. (2000 [1781-7]), Critique of Pure Reason, P. Guyer and A. Wood (ed. and trans.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kant, I. (2000 [1790]), Critique of the Power of Judgment, in P. Guyer (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kant, I. (2006 [1795]), “Toward Perpetual Peace (1795)”, in M. Gregor (ed.), Immanuel Kant. Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.311-352.
Kant, I. (2006 [1793]), “On the Common Saying: This May Be Correct in Theory, But It Is of No Use in Practice (1793)”, in M. Gregor (ed.), Immanuel Kant. Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.273-310.
Kant, I. (2006 [1797]), “The Metaphysics of Morals (1797)”, in M. Gregor (ed.), Immanuel Kant. Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.353-604.
Kant, I. (2016 [1764-]), “Reflections on the philosophy of right”, in F. Rauscher and K.R. Westphal (eds.), Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Keating, P. (2007), The function of ideas of reason in Kant’s political philosophy, PhD Thesis submitted at the University of New South Wales, (accessed on 12.11.’20), available at http://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/fapi/datastream/unsworks:1649/SOURCE02?view=true Tierney, B. (2001), “Kant on Property: the Problem of Permissive Law”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 62(2), pp.301-12.
Zöller G. and Louden R.B. (eds.) (2012), Immanuel Kant. Anthropology, History and Education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4899239
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.

ISSN: 2386-7655
URL: http://con-textoskantianos.net








