Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico El misterio de la pobreza: ¿Cómo puede una Doctrina Metafísica del Derecho ayudarnos a entender la realidad social?
Resumen
En este artículo intervengo en la discusión sobre si es posible encontrar en la filosofía política de Kant una fundamentación de los derechos sociales básicos. Me centraré en primer lugar en dar sentido a la idea de una doctrina metafísica del derecho. En segundo lugar, trataré de mostrar dónde se encuentran los límites de la doctrina metafísica del derecho de Kant a la hora de debatir sobre la forma en que la sociedad debe o debía organizarse (en los tiempos actuales, pero también en la época de Kant). Por último, esbozaré rutas alternativas para usar el enfoque metafísico de Kant con el fin de abordar cuestiones de justicia social, en particular, el tema de la pobreza.
Palabras clave
Referencias
Baron, Marcia/Fahmy, Melissa Seymour (2009): “Beneficence and Other Duties of Love in The Metaphysics of Morals, en Thomas E. Hill (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Kant’s Ethics, London, Blackwell, 211-228.
Becker, Gary (1962): “Investment in Human Capital. A Theoretical Analysis.” Journal of Political Economy, 70/5, 9-49.
Brynjolfsson, Erik/McAfee, Andrew (2014): The Second Machine Age. Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies, New York, Norton.
Byrd, Sharon; Hruschka, Joachim (2010): Kant's Doctrine of Right: A commentary, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
De Soto, Hernando (2000): The Mistery of Capital. Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else, London, Black Swan Books.
Doyle, Michael W (1983): “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 12/3, 205–235.
The Economist (2006): “The mistery of capital deepens.” The Economist, 26/08/2006. Accesible en .
Faggion, Andrea/Pinzani, Alessandro/Sanchez Madrid, Nuria (eds.) (2016): Kant and Social Policies, London, Palgrave MacMillan.
Gilabert, Pablo (2010): “Kant and the Claims of the Poor”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81/2, 382-418.
Gorz, André (1999): Reclaiming Work. Beyond the Wage-Based Society, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Gravois, John (2005): “The de Soto delusion.” Slate, 29/01/2005. Accesible en:
Habermas, Jürgen (1996): Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press.
Hasan, Rafeeq (2018): “Freedom and Poverty in the Kantian State”, European Journal of Philosophy, 1-21.
Himmelfarb, Gertrud (1984): The Idea of Poverty. England in the Early Industrial Age, New York, Alfred A. Knopf.
Höffe, Otfried (1999): “Der kategorische Rechtsimperativ. ‘Einleitung in die Rechtslehre’„, en O. Höffe. (ed.), Immanuel Kant. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre, Berlin, Akademie, 41-62.
Holtman, Sarah (2004): “Kantian justice and poverty relief”, Kant-Studien, 95, 2004, 86–106.
Keynes, John M. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1936.
Leão Rego, Walquíria/Pinzani, Alessandro (2016): “Money, Autonomy, Citizenship. Effects of the Programa Bolsa Família on Its Participants”, Philosophy and Public Issues, 6/3, 115-159.
Mészáros, Itsvan (1995): Beyond Capital: Toward a Theory of Transition, New York, NYU Press.
Pinheiro Walla, Alice (2016): “Common Possession of the Earth and Cosmopolitan Right.” Kant-Studien, vol. 107/1, 160-178.
Pinzani, Alessandro/Sanchez Madrid, Nuria (2016): “The State Looks Down. Some Reassesments of Kant’s Appraisal of Citizenship”, en A. Faggion, A. Pinzani and N. Sanchez Madrid (eds.), Kant and Social Policies, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 25-47.
Pinzani, Alessandro (2017): “Beati Possidentes? Kant on Inequality and Poverty”, Ethic@, vol. 16/3, 475-492.
Pinzani, Alessandro (en prensa): “Wie kann äußere Freiheit ein angeborenes Recht sein?”, en Carola Freiin von Villiez/Jean-Christophe Merle (eds.), Kants Metaphysik der Sitten. Der Zusammenhang von Recht- und Tugendlehre, Berlin, de Gruyter.
Pogge, Thomas (2002): “Is Kant’s Rechtslehre a ‘Comprehensive Liberalism’?” In M. Timmons (ed.), Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. Interpretative Essays, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 133-158.
Rawls, John (2001): Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge (MA), Belknap.
Rifkin, Jeremy (1995): The End of Work. The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era, New York, Putnam.
Ripstein, Arhur (2009): Force and freedom. Kant’s legal and political philosophy, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Simmel, Georg (2004): The Philosophy of Money, London, Routledge.
Somers, Margaret/Block, Fred (2005): “From Poverty to Perversity: Ideas, Markets, and Institutions over 200 Years of Welfare Debate”, American Sociological Review. Vol. 70, 270-287.
Stohr, Karen (2011): “Kantian Beneficence and the Problem of Obligatory Aid”, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 8/1, 45-67.
Van Parijs, Philippe (1995): Real Freedom for All, What (if anything) can justify capitalism, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Varden, Helga (2014): “Patriotism, Poverty, and Global Justice: A Kantian Engagement with Pauline Kleingeld's Kant and Cosmopolitanism”. Kantian Review, 19/2, 251-266.
Weinrib, Ernest (2012): “Poverty and property in Kant's system of rights”. In: Corrective justice, by E. Weinrib. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 263-297.
Wood, Allen (2002): “The Final Form of Kant’s Practical Philosophy”, en M. Timmons (ed.), Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. Interpretative Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-21.
DOI (HTML): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6591032
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
ISSN: 2386-7655
URL: http://con-textoskantianos.net
