Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico Exploring the Deduction of the Category of Totality from within the Analytic of the Sublime
Resumen
I defend an interpretation of the first Critique’s category of totality based on Kant’s analysis of totality in the third Critique’s Analytic of the mathematical sublime. I show, firstly, that in the latter Kant delineates the category of totality — however general it may be — in relation to the essentially singular standpoint of the subject. Despite the fact that sublime and categorial totality have a significantly different scope and function, they do share such a singular baseline. Secondly, I argue that Kant’s note (in the first Critique’s metaphysical deduction) that deriving the category of totality requires a special act of the understanding can be seen as a ‘mark’ of that singular baseline. This way, my aesthetical ‘detour’ has the potential of revealing how itself.
Palabras clave
Referencias
Allison, H. (2004), Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: Revised and Enlarged Edition, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Borboa, S. de J. S. (2018), “On Kant’s Derivation of the Categories”, Kant-Studien, no. 4, pp. 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2018-3002.
Crowther, P. (1989), The Kantian Sublime: From Morality to Art, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
De Vleeschauwer, H. J. (1931), Immanuel Kant, N.V. Standaard-Boekhandel, Antwerpen. Ginsborg, H. (2016), The Role of Taste in Kant’s Theory of Cognition. Routledge, New
Y ork.
Ginsborg, H. (2019), “Kant’s Aesthetics and Teleology”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (Winter 2019), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/kant- aesthetics/.
Kant, I. (1900a), “Gesammelte Schriften (Vol. 1–22)”, Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin.
Kant, I. (1900b), Kritik der reinen Vernunft (B. Erdmann, coord.), De Gruyter, Berlin. Kant, I. (2000), Critique of the Power of Judgment (P. Guyer & E. Matthews, Trans.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804656
Kukla, R. (2006), “Introduction: Placing the Aesthetic in Kant’s Critical Epistemology”, en
R. Kukla (coord.), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498220.001
Longuenesse, B. (1998), Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Longuenesse, B. (2005), Kant on the Human Standpoint, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Pierobon, F. (2005), “Quelques Remarques Sur la Conception Kantienne du Jugement Singulier”, Kant-Studien, no. 3, pp. 312–335. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.2005.96.3.312
Pillow, K. (2000), Sublime Understanding: Aesthetic Reflection in Kant and Hegel, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Smith, S. D. (2015), “Kant’s Mathematical Sublime and the Role of the Infinite: Reply to Crowther”, Kantian Review, no. 1, pp. 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415414000302
V andenabeele, B. (2015), The Sublime in Schopenhauer’ s Philosophy, Palgrave Macmillan, London. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-3235223
Van de Vijver, G., & Noé, E. (2011), “The Constraint Is the Possibility: A Dynamical Perspective on Kant’s Theory of Objectivity”, Idealistic Studies, no. 1-2, pp. 95-112.
Zammito, J. (1992), The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Zuckert, R. (2019), “Kant’s Account of the Sublime as Critique”, Kant Yearbook, no. 1, pp. 101–120.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304113
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
ISSN: 2386-7655
URL: http://con-textoskantianos.net
