Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico A New Look at Kant’s Genius: a Proposal of a Multi- componential Account
Resumen
As numerous scholars pointed out, Kant’s account of genius suffers from internal inconsistency, primarily due to the contradictory way in which Kant talks about the relation between imagination and taste in artistic production. What remains unclear is whether taste and genius work in concord in order to produce beautiful art, or whether one or the other takes charge. In this paper I look at this challenge, and I offer an interpretation of how Kant conceives of genius. I argue that the gift of genius is multi-componential, including the capacity to maximize imagination’s productivity as well as the capacity to develop taste to the point where one can extract the rules for art production, internalize them and implement them in one’s own original and exemplary artistic production. By analyzing specific claims Kant makes in relation to beautiful art, primarily his account of poetry, I extrapolate further aspects of artistic genius, which relate to his capacity to create artworks imbued with moral and cognitive significance, and which enable the awakening of genius in other artists.
Palabras clave
Referencias
Allison, H. (2001), Kant’s Theory of Taste;A Reading of the Critique if Aesthetic
Judgment, Cambridge University Press.
Bruno, P.W. (2010), Kant's Concept of Genius: Its Origin and Function in the Third
Critique, Continuum.
Carroll, L.K. (2008), “Kant’s “Formalism”? – Distinguishing between Aesthetic Judgment and an Overall Response to Art in the Critique of Judgment”, AE: Canadian Aesthetics Journal, 14, pp. 1-14.
Crawford, D. (1974), Kant’s Aesthetic Theory, University of Wisconsin Press. Guyer, P. (1994), “Kant’s Conception of Fine Art”, The Journal of Aesthetic and Art
Criticism, 52, no.3, pp. 275–285.
Kant Immanuel, (2000), Critique of the Power of Judgment, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, edited by Paul Guyer and translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews
Kemal, S. (1992), Kant's Aeshetic Theory, Palgrave Macmillan.
Kivy, P. (2001), The Possessor and the Possessed: Handel, Mozart, Beethoven and Idea of
Music, Yale University Press.
Kivy, P. (2003), The Seventh Sense: A Study of Francis Hutcheson's Aesthetics, and its
Influence in Eighteenth-Century Britain, 2nd edition, Clarendon press Oxford.
Kuplen, M. (2019), “Cognitive Interpretation of Kant’s Theory of Aesthetic Ideas”
Estetika; The Central European Journal of Aesthetics, l,vi, 48-64
Lamarque P. and S. Haugom Olsen, (1994), Truth, Fiction, and Literature: A
Philosophical Perspective, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Matherne, S. (2016), „Kant's Theory of Imagination, u A. Kind ur., The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Imagination, London: Routledge. pp. 55-68.
Matherne, S. (2013), “The Inclusive Interpretation of Kant’s Aesthetic Ideas”, The British Journal of Aesthetics 53, no.1, pp. 21–39.
Murray, B. (2015), The Possibility of Culture: Pleasure and Moral Development in Kant’s Aesthetics, Willey.
John, E. (2016), “Theme” in The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Literature, eds. N. Carroll and J. Gibson, Routledge.
Ostarić, L. (2006), Between Insight and Judgment: Kant's Conception of Genius and Its Fate in Early Schelling, doctoral thesis.
Ostarić , L. (2010), “Works of genius as sensible exhibitions of the idea of the highest good”, Kant-Studien 101 (1), pp. 22-39.
Pillow, K. (2006), “Understanding Aestheticized” in Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, ed. Roberta Kukla, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rogerson, K. (2008), The Problem of Free Harmony in Kant's Aesthetics, Sunny Press. Wicks, R. (2007), Kant on Judgment, Routledge.
Zammito, J. (1992), The Genesis of Kant's Critique of Judgment, University of Chicago Press.
Vidmar Jovanović, I. (2020), “Kant on Poetry and Cognition”, The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 54,1, pp. 1-17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304084
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
ISSN: 2386-7655
URL: http://con-textoskantianos.net
