Can Kant’s Aesthetics Accommodate Conceptual Art? A Reply to Costello

Ioannis Trisokkas


Diarmuid Costello has recently argued that, contra received opinion, Kant’s aesthetics can accommodate conceptual art, as well as all other art. Costello offers an interpretation of Kant’s art theory that demands from all art a minimal structure involving three basic “players” (the artist, the artwork, the artwork’s recipient) and three basic “actions” corresponding to those “players.” The article takes issue with the “action” assigned by Costello’s Kant to the artwork’s recipient, namely that her imagination generates a multitude of playful thoughts deriving from or in any other way relating to the concept or idea that the artist has instilled in the artwork and that the artwork transmits to the recipient. It is argued that the “proper” recipient of conceptual art may very well have a multitude of thoughts that are all irrelevant to the concept or idea the artist has instilled in the artwork, even if the artwork has transmitted that concept or idea to the recipient. This shows that Kant’s art theory, as presented by Costello, cannot accommodate conceptual art. I conclude by suggesting that either one of two amendments to the theory’s account of the recipient’s experience could enable it to accommodate conceptual art.

Palabras clave

Kant; conceptual art; ideality; kindred thoughts; aesthetics; Costello

Texto completo:



Alberro, A. and Stimson, B. (1999), Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Bochner, M. (1967), “The Serial Attitude,” in Alberro and Stimson (1999), pp. 22-27. Boudaille, G. (1968), “Interview with Daniel Buren,” in Alberro and Stimson (1999), pp.


Cohen, H. (2018) “A Million Millennial Medicis,” in Explorations in Art and Technology,

ed. L. Candy, E. Edmonds, and F. Poltronieri, London, Springer, pp. 39-50.

Costa, E., Escari, R., and Jacoby, R. (1967), “A Media Art (Manifesto),” in Happenings,

ed. O. Masotta, Jorge Alvarez, Bueno Aires, pp. 119-122.

Costello, D. (2007), “Kant after Lewitt: Towards an Aesthetics of Conceptual Art,” in

Goldie and Schellekens (2007), pp. 92-105.

Costello, D. (2009), “Retrieving Kant’s Aesthetics for Art Theory After Greenberg,” in

Halsall et al. (2009), pp. 117-132.

Goldie, P. and Schellekens, E. (eds.) (2007), Philosophy and Conceptual Art, Clarendon

Press, Oxford.

Greenberg, C. (1986-1993), The Collected Essays and Criticism, vols. I-IV, Chicago

University Press, Chicago.

Greenberg, C. (1999), Homemade Esthetics: Observations on Art and Taste, Oxford

University Press, Oxford.

Guyer, P. (2006), ‘The Harmony of the Faculties Revisited,” in Aesthetics and Cognition

in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, ed. R. Kukla, Cambridge University Press,

Cambridge, pp. 162-193.

Halsall, F., Jansen, J., and O’Connor, T. (eds.) (2009), Rediscovering Aesthetics, Columbia

University Press, New York, NY.

Kant, I. (1790), Critique of Judgement, trans. W. S. Pluhar, Hackett, Indianapolis, 1987. Lewitt, S. (1967), “Paragraphs on Conceptual Art,” in Alberro and Stimson (1999), pp. 12-

Oiticica, H. (1966), “Position and Program,” in Alberro and Stimson (1999), pp. 8-10. Oiticica, H. (1967), “General Scheme of the New Objectivity,” in Alberro and Stimson

(1999), pp. 40-42.

Piper, A. (1967), “A Defense of the ‘Conceptual’ Process in Art,” in A. Piper, Out of Order, Out of Sight, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996, pp. 3-4.

Schellekens, E. (2017), “Conceptual Art,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Reinhardt, A. (1953), “Twelve Rules for a New Academy,” ArtNews 56, no. 3 (May 1957), pp. 37-38.

Reinhardt, A. (1962), “Art as Art,” Art International 6, no. 10 (December 1962). Rogerson, K. F. (2008), The Problem of Free Harmony in Kant’s Aesthetics, SUNY Press,

Albany, NY.

Wood, A. W. (2005), Kant, Blackwell, Malden, MA. Wood, P. (2002), Conceptual Art, Tate Publishing, London.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para realizar análisis de uso y de medición de nuestra web para mejorar nuestros servicios. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso.

Creative Commons by-nc 3.0 Logo

ISSN: 2386-7655


  Scimago Journal & Country Rankscopus logo


DOAJ LogoErih Plus LogoCitefactor logoredib Logo

LatIndex LogoISOC Logo MIAR Logo
MLA LogoZenodo Logo
ESCI LogoEBSCO LOGOWeb of Science