Cosmopolitanism in Kant’s Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View: Regulative Ideas and Empirical Evidence

Roberta Pasquarè

Resumen


With this paper I analyze Kant’s account of the human vocation to cosmopolitanism discussed in the last section of the Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (7:321-333) and show how Kant’s notion of cosmopolitanism requires the cooperation of pure reason and pragmatic anthropology. My main thesis is that pure reason provides regulative ideas, thereby maintaining a foundational role, and pragmatic anthropology provides empirical evidence, thereby reinforcing the theoretical and practical status of reason’s ideas. In developing my analysis, I argue that Kant reframes the question ‘What is the human being?’ in a non-essential way, foregrounds a moral practical concern, and assigns freedom an unprecedented role. Finally, I relate my analysis to two questions frequently discussed in Kant scholarship, namely the problem of whether the Anthropology has only a pragmatic or also a moral scope and the problem of the relation between the Anthropology and Kant’s critical system.


Palabras clave


Cosmopolitanism; Pragmatic Anthropology; Pure Reason; Freedom

Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Brandt, R. (1999), Kommentar zu Kants Anthropologie. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.

Cohen, A. (2009), Kant and the Human Sciences. Biology, Anthropology and History.

Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Frierson, P. (2003), Freedom and Anthropology in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, New York et al.: Cambridge University Press.

González, A. M. (2011), Culture as Mediation: Kant on Nature, Culture, and Morality. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.

Herman, B. (2009), “A habitat for humanity”, in Oksenberg Rorty A. and Schmidt J. (eds.),

KANT’S Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim. A Critical Guide.

Cambridge, New York et al.: Cambridge University Press, pp. 150-170.

Jacobs, B. and Kain P. (eds.) (2003), Essays on Kant’s Anthropology. Cambridge, New York et al: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. [1749-1800] (1999), Correspondence, ed. and trans. by Zweig A. Cambridge/New York et al.: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. [1781-1787] (1998), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. and ed. by Guyer P. and Wood A. W., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. [1784] (2007), “Idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan Aim,” Anthropology, History, and Education, ed. by Zöller G. and Louden R. B., trans. by Gregor M., Guyer P., et al. Cambridge, New York et al.: Cambridge University

Press.

Kant, I. [1785] (1996), “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals,” Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. by Gregor M.; intr. by Wood A. W., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. [1788] (1996), “Critique of Practical Reason,” Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. by Gregor M.; intr. by Wood A. W., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. [1790] (2000), Critique of the Power of Judgment, ed. by Guyer P., trans. by Guyer P. and Matthews E., Cambridge, New York et al.: Cambridge University

Press.

Kant, I. [1793] (1996), “On the Common Saying: That may be Correct in Theory, but it is of no Use in Practice,” Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. by Gregor M.; intr. by

Wood A. W., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. [1795] (1996), “Toward Perpetual Peace,” Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. by

Gregor M.; intr. by Wood A. W, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. [1797] (1996), “Metaphysics of Morals,” Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. by

Gregor M.; intr. by Wood A. W, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. [1798] (1996), “The Conflict of the Faculties,” Religion and Rational Theology, trans. and ed. by Wood A. W. and Di Giovanni G. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. [1798] (2007), “Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View,” Anthropology, History, and Education, ed. by Zöller G. and Louden R. B., trans. by Gregor M., Guyer P. et al. Cambridge, New York et al.: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. [1800] (1992), “The Jäsche logic,” Lectures on Logic, trans. and ed. by Young J. M. Cambridge, New York et al.: Cambridge University Press.

Kleingeld, P . (1995), Fortschritt und V ernunft. Zur Geschichtsphilosophie Kants. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

Kleingeld, P. (1999), “Kant, History, and the Idea of Moral Development”, The History of Philosophy Quarterly 16, No. 1, pp. 59-80.

Kleingeld, P. (2001), “Nature or Providence? On the Theoretical and Moral Importance of Kant's Philosophy of History”, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, LXXV, No. 2, pp. 201-219.

Lorini, G. and Louden R. B. (eds.) (2018), Knowledge, Morals and Practice in Kant’s Anthropology. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Louden, R. B. (2000), Kant’s Impure Ethics. From Rational Beings to Human Beings. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Louden, R. B. (2011), Kant’s Human Being. Essays on His Theory of Human Nature. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

Zöller G. (2011), “Kant’s Political Anthropology“, in Heidemann D. (ed.), Kant Yearbook 3/2011. Anthropology. New York/Boston: Walter De Gruyter, pp. 131-161.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3583151

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para realizar análisis de uso y de medición de nuestra web para mejorar nuestros servicios. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso.


Creative Commons by-nc 3.0 Logo

ISSN: 2386-7655

URL: http://con-textoskantianos.net

DOAJ LogoErih Plus LogoCitefactor logoredib Logo
LatIndex LogoISOC Logo MIAR Logo
SHERPA/RoMEO Logo
MLA LogoZenodo Logo
ESCI LogoEBSCO LOGOWeb of Sciencescopus logo