The Understanding in Transition: Fascicles X, XI and VII of Opus postumum

Terrence Thomson

Resumen


This essay investigates the transformation of the faculty of understanding in Kant’s Transition from Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science to Physics drafts found in Opus postumum. I argue that in fascicles X and XI Kant implicitly reverses the architectonic order of sensibility and understanding. Without an account of this reversal, Kant’s critique of Isaac Newton’s conception of phenomena and the so called Selbstsetzungslehre (doctrine of self-positing) in fascicle VII fall apart. I argue that what is at stake is a challenge Kant makes to his own presuppositions and a challenge to the Kantian philosopher who wishes to stay with a strictly ‘critical’ Kant.

 

Palabras clave


faculties; understanding; sensibility; architectonic; natural science; phenomena

Texto completo:

PDF HTML

Referencias


Adickes, Erich. (1920), Kants Opus postumum: dargestellt und beurteilt. Berlin: Reuther and Reichard.

Allison, Henry E. (1973), The Kant-Eberhard Controversy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Basile, Giovanni Pietro. (2013), Kants Opus postumum und seine Rezeption. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter

Beiser, Frederick. (2008), German Idealism: The Struggle Against Subjectivism, 1781-1801. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Bradley, F.H. (1916), Appearance and Reality: A Metaphysical Essay. London: George Allen and Unwin.

Caygill, Howard. (2005), 'The Force of Kant's Opus postumum: Kepler and Newton in the XIth Fascicle'. Angelaki vol. 10, no.1: pp.33-42.

Caygill, Howard. (2007), 'The Transition Problem in Kant's Opus postumum'. In Kant: Making Reason Intuitive, ed. Loli Patellis, Kyriaki Goudeli, Pavlos Kontos, pp.16-27. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Deleuze, Gilles. (2008), Kant's Critical Philosophy. trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. London: Continuum Publishing.

Descartes, Rene. (1999), Selected Philosophical Writings. trans. John Cottingham and Robert Stoothoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Edwards, Jeffrey. (2000), Substance, Force, and the Possibility of Knowledge: On Kant's Philosophy of Material Nature. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Ellis, Addison. (2017), 'The Case for Absolute Spontaneity in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason'. Con-Textos Kantianos no.6: pp.138-164.

Feyerabend, Paul K. (1985), Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method: Philosophical Papers Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Friedman, Michael. (1994), Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Förster, Eckart. (2000), Kant's Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus postumum. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Fӧrster, Eckart. (1989), 'Kant's Selbstsetzungslehre'. In Kant's Transcendental Deductions: The Three 'Critiques' and the 'Opus postumum', ed. Eckart Fӧrster, pp.217-238. California: Stanford University Press.

Gardner, Sebastian. (1999), Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason. Oxon: Routledge. Hall, Bryan Wesley. (2017), The Post-Critical Kant: Understanding the Critical Philosophy Through the Opus postumum. Oxon: Routledge.

Heidegger, Martin. (1997), Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Hoppe, Hansgeorg. (1969), Kants Theorie der Physik: Eine Untersuchung über das Opus postumum von Kant. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.

Kerszberg, Pierre. (2012), 'Deduction Versus Discourse: Newton and the Cosmic Phenomena'. Foundations of Science vol.18, no.3: pp.529-44.

Koyré, Alexandre. (1965), Newtonian Studies. London: Chapman and Hall.

Kuhn, Thomas S. (2012), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lambert, Johann. (2009), 'New Organon'. In Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials, eds. Eric Watkins and Manfred Kuehn, pp.257-274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lehmann, Gerhard. (1969), Beiträge zur Geschichte und Interpretation der Philosophie Kants. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. (1989), Philosophical Essays. trans. Roger Ariew and Daniel Garbor. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

Lichtenberg, Georg Christoph. (2012), Philosophical Writings. trans and ed. Steven Tester. New York: State University of New York Press.

Locke, John. (1995), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. New York: Prometheus Books.

Martin, Gottfried. (1974), Kant's Metaphysics and Theory of Science. trans. P.G. Lucas. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.

Massimi, Michela. (2018), 'Grounds, Modality, and Nomic Necessity in the Critical Kant.' In Kant and the Laws of Nature, ed. Michela Massimi and Angela Breitenbach, pp.150-70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Maxwell, Nicholas. (2017), In Praise of Natural Philosophy. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.

McDowell, John. (1996), Mind and World. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Newton, Isaac. (1999), The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. trans. I.Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman. California: University of California Press.

Smith, Norman Kemp. (1992), Commentary to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press International

Sng, Zachary. (2010), The Rhetoric of Error from Locke to Kleist. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Tuschling, Burkhard. (1971), Metaphysische und Transzendentale Dynamik in Kants Opus postumum. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Tuschling, Burkhard. (1989), 'Apperception and Ether: On the Idea of a Transcendental Deduction of Matter in Kant's Opus postumum'. In Kant's Transcendental Deductions: The Three 'Critiques' and the 'Opus postumum', ed. Eckart Fӧrster, pp.193-217. California: Stanford University Press.

Tuschling, Burkhard. (1993), 'The Concept of Transcendental Idealism in Kant's Opus postumum'. In Kant and Critique: New Essays in Honour of W.H. Werkmeister, ed. R.M. Dancy, pp.151-167. Netherlands: Springer.

Werkmeister, W.H. (1980), Kant: the Architectonic and Development of His Philosophy. Illinois: Open court.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3250380

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para realizar análisis de uso y de medición de nuestra web para mejorar nuestros servicios. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso.


Creative Commons by-nc 3.0 Logo

ISSN: 2386-7655

URL: http://con-textoskantianos.net

DOAJ LogoErih Plus LogoCitefactor logoredib Logo
LatIndex LogoISOC Logo MIAR Logo
SHERPA/RoMEO Logo
MLA LogoZenodo Logo
ESCI LogoEBSCO LOGOWeb of Sciencescopus logo